|
NEW TESTAMENT EXAMPLES
|
|
|
AV King James Version (based
on the MajT)
|
New International Version
(based on the MinT)
|
New American Standard
(based on the MinT)
|
New World Translation
(based on the MinT) – cult
(JW) based translation
|
TTGM Comments
(comments based on truth)
|
|
Mt 9:13
|
for I am not
come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
|
For I have not come to
call the righteous, but sinners.
|
For I did not come to
call the righteous, but sinners.
|
For I came to call, not
righteous people, but sinners.
|
The Minority Text (MinT)
leaves out the most important part that a sinner must do. Repentance. ( see 2nd
witness Luke 5:32)
|
|
Mt 18:11
|
For the Son of man is
come to save that which was lost.
|
OMITTED
|
footnote casts doubt
|
OMITTED
|
The spirit behind the MinT
removed this very important verse about our Lord. Why?
Think motive.
|
|
Mt 19:17
|
Why callest
thou me good?
|
"Why do you ask me
about what is good?"
|
"Why are you asking
me about what is good?"
|
"Why do you ask me about what is
good?"
|
This was changed in the
MinT because they did not want that Yeshua (Jesus) Himself be addressed
as “good”.
|
|
Mt 25:13
|
Ye know neither the day
nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
|
You do not know the day
or the hour.
|
You do not know the day nor the hour.
|
You know neither the day
nor the hour,
|
Why would you want to
leave out the one that said He (Yeshua) will return (in that hour).
|
|
Mk 10:24
|
.how hard it is for
them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!
|
.how hard it is to enter
the kingdom of God!
|
.how hard it is to enter
the kingdom of God!
|
.how difficult a thing it
is to enter into the kingdom of God!
|
Why would you not want
the rich to know that it is hard for them to enter the Kingdom of heaven
(as the young ruler did, he put his riches before Christ)
|
|
Lk 2:33
|
And Joseph and
his mother,,,
|
The child's father and
mother.
|
His father and mother.
|
its father and
mother.
|
The MajT calls him Joseph,
but the MinT implies that he (Joseph) is the father of Christ. Casting
doubt re His virgin birth.
|
|
Lk 4:4
|
Man shall not live by
bread alone, but by every word of God.
|
Man does not live on bread alone.
|
Man shall not live on bread alone.
|
Man must not live by
bread alone.
|
The MinT removes the
importance of the word of God.
|
|
Lk 4:8
|
Get thee behind me, Satan.
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
The spirit behind the
MinT removed this very important verse about how to deal with satan. Why?
Think motive.
|
|
Mk 9:29
|
This kind can come forth
by nothing, but by prayer and
fasting.
|
This kind can come out
only by prayer.
OMITTED in Mt 17:21
|
This kind cannot come out
by anything but prayer.
|
This kind cannot get out
by anything except by prayer.
|
Now a thinking person
would know that spiritual people (eg. disciples) would at least be men of
prayer. However, our Lord says to include fasting to deal with tough
demons that are stubborn to come out.
Now the question is; why would
the spirit behind the MinT remove the word fasting?
Could the motive be this spirit does not want the believer to know how to
get out stubborn demons? Hmmmm, could this be a
glaring motive? Think, the answer is simple
|
|
Jn 6:47
|
He that believeth on
me hath everlasting life.
|
He who believes has
everlasting life.
|
He who believes has
eternal life.
|
He that believes has
everlasting life.
|
Why would MinT leave out
the “me”(Yeshua) for everlasting life?
Again think motive.
|
|
Jn 8:9
|
And when they heard
it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out.
|
.those who heard began to
go away.
|
.when they heard it, they
began to go out one by one.
|
OMITTED
|
Why conviction of conscience
would be left out by the MinT. Is it not critical to know that your conscience plays a role in what you
do?
|
|
Jn 9:4
|
I must
work the works of him that sent me.
|
We must do the work of
him who sent me.
|
We must work the works of
Him who sent Me.
|
We must work the works of
him that sent me.
|
The MinT changes the
mandate of the Father to the Son (only) to we
(the believers). It is the Son only that is able to complete the works of
the Father. Why? All have sinned and fallen short (not the Son).
|
|
Jn 10:30
|
I and my Father
are one
|
I and the Father are one.
|
I and the Father are one.
|
I and the Father are one.
|
“My Father” implies
oneness/sameness with God in the text. This is why the Jews were going to
stone Him; He made himself equal with God (Joh 10:33). Why would the MinT
want to remove “my”?
Again think motive.
|
|
Ac 2:30
|
that of the fruit of his
loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to
sit on his throne;
|
.he would place one of
his descendants on his throne.
|
.to seat one of his
descendants upon his throne.
|
.he would seat one from
the fruitage of his loins upon his throne.
|
Why would the MinT leave
out the name of Christ to be seated on the throne? And let us not leave out,
“on the right hand of the Father”. Too much for them to take maybe? ….motive
|
|
Ac 8:37
|
If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said,
I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
|
OMITTED
|
footnote casts doubt (some
editions just omit it)
|
OMITTED
|
The spirit behind the
MinT removed this very important verse about our Lord. Why?
The eunuch was required
to confess the King of kings before he could be baptized.
Think motive.
|
|
Ac 23:9
|
Let us not fight against
God.
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
The spirit behind the
MinT removed this very important verse about us fighting against God.
Why?
Think motive.
|
|
Rom 13:9
|
Thou shalt not bear false
witness.
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
OMITTED
|
The spirit behind the
MinT removed this very important verse about being a false witness. Why?
Think motive.
|
|
Co 1:14
|
In whom we have
redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.
|
In whom we have
redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
|
In whom we have
redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
|
By means of whom we have
our release by ransom, the forgiveness of our sins.
|
Why would the MinT remove
the blood? The blood that purchased His church. The blood that was used
to redeem His church.
|
|
1Ti 3:16
|
God was manifest
in the flesh.
|
He appeared in a body.
|
He who was revealed in
the flesh.
|
He was made manifest in
the flesh.
|
The spirit behind the
MinT does not want us to know that Yeshua is God manifested in the flesh.
Why?
|
|
1Ti 6:5
|
Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of
the truth, supposing that gain is
godliness: from such withdraw thyself.
|
"from such withdraw
thyself" is omitted
|
"from such withdraw
thyself" is omitted
|
"from such withdraw
thyself" is omitted
|
The spirit behind the
MinT does not want the believer to withdraw himself from people that have
the spirit of anti-Christ. Why?
|
|
1Pe 1:22
|
Ye have purified your
souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit.
|
you have purified
yourselves by obeying the truth.
|
Since you have in
obedience to the truth purified your souls.
|
Now that you have
purified your souls by your obedience to the truth.
|
Why does the spirit of
the MinT not want the believer to obey truth through the Holy Ghost
(Spirit)?
|
|
1Jo 4:3
|
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of
God.
|
But every spirit that
does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God.
|
And every spirit that does
not confess Jesus is not from God.
|
But every inspired
expression that does not confess Jesus does not originate with God.
|
Why does the spirit of
the MinT not want the believer to know that Christ is come in the flesh?
|
|
1Jo 5:7
|
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and
the Holy Ghost: and these three
are one.
|
For there are three that
testify:
|
For there are three that
testify.
|
For there are three
witness bearers
|
Why would the MinT change
the strongest verse that supports the doctrine of the Trinity? Three persons (they are each a
witness), one God.
If you look at the other examples of scripture that are given on this report
it should be no surprise as to why.
|
|
Re 5:14
|
Four and twenty elders
fell down and worshipped him that liveth
for ever and ever.
|
.the elders fell down and
worshipped.
|
.the elders fell down and
worshipped.
|
.the elders fell down and
worshipped.
|
Why does the spirit of
the MinT not want the “Him” in the text to be recognized for worship as
well as He liveth for ever and ever. Why? Because, Him is Yeshua,
and Yeshua is God and deserving of worship.
|
|
Re 20:9
|
Fire came down from
God out of heaven.
|
Fire came down from
heaven.
|
Fire came down from heaven.
|
Fire came down out of
heaven.
|
Why does the spirit of
the MinT not want the believer to know that God is responsible for the
fire that is going to come down?
|
|
Re 21:24
|
And the nations of
them which are saved shall walk in the light of it.
|
The nations will walk by
its light.
|
And the nations shall
walk by its light.
|
And the nations will walk
by means of its light.
|
Why does the spirit of the
MinT leave out the fact that only the “saved” will be around?
|
|
OLD TESTAMENT EXAMPLE
|
|
Mic 5:2
|
But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands
of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler
in Israel; whose goings forth have
been from of old, from
everlasting.
|
But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of
Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose
origins are from of old, from ancient times.
|
But as for you, Bethlehem
Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of
Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His
goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity
|
And you, O Bethʹle·hem Ephʹra·thah,
The one too little to be among the thousands* of Judah, From you will
come out for me the one to be ruler in Israel, Whose origin is from
ancient times, from the days of long ago.
|
This verse speaks of the
coming Massiah (Yeshua). From the translators of the MinT they try to
turn Yeshua into a created being in an old testament prophecy by saying
He was in time and His arrival (creation) was from ancient times. However,
the King James version correctly renders our Lord’s existence from “everlasting”.
Correctly done, why? Only God is everlasting (He is an eternal being
without a beginning). NAS has a little better rendition (days of
eternity). The JW cult has made a recent change
to “days long ago”, before it was, “days of time indefinite”. Crazy
stuff. Yeshua was from everlasting (always existed). Amen.
TTGM: We hope by now you can see the motive or attempt by
translations (based on corrupted manuscripts) other than the King James
to subvert the doctrine of the Word in many areas.
We can only say, be not deceived.
Eternity is too long to spend in regret.
|
