|
HISTORY OF STATE & “CHURCH” INVOLVEMENT IN MARRIAGE BETWEEN
PEOPLE
ACCOUNT 1
WHY do people — gay or straight — need the state’s
permission to marry? For most of Western history, they didn’t, because
marriage was a private contract between two families. The parents’
agreement to the match, not the approval of church or state, was what confirmed
its validity. For 16 centuries, Christianity also defined the validity of a
marriage on the basis of a couple’s wishes. If two people claimed they had
exchanged marital vows — even out alone by the haystack — the Catholic
Church accepted that they were validly married. In 1215, the church decreed that a “licit”
marriage must take place in church. But people who married illictly had the same rights and obligations as a
couple married in church: their children were legitimate; the wife had the
same inheritance rights; the couple was subject to the same prohibitions
against divorce. Not until the 16th century did European states begin to
require that marriages be performed under legal auspices. In part, this was
an attempt to prevent unions between young adults whose parents opposed
their match. The American colonies officially required marriages to be
registered, but until the mid-19th century, state supreme courts routinely
ruled that public cohabitation was sufficient evidence of a valid marriage.
By the later part of that century, however, the United States began to
nullify common-law marriages and exert more control over who was allowed to
marry. By the 1920s, 38 states prohibited whites from marrying blacks,
“mulattos,” Japanese, Chinese, Indians, “Mongolians,” “Malays” or
Filipinos. Twelve states would not issue a marriage license if one partner
was a drunk, an addict or a “mental defect.” Eighteen states set barriers
to remarriage after divorce. In the mid-20th century, governments began to
get out of the business of deciding which couples were “fit” to marry.
Courts invalidated laws against interracial marriage, struck down other
barriers and even extended marriage rights to prisoners. Taking Marriage
Private (by Stephanie Coontz, professor of history at Evergreen State
College and author of Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage.)
But governments began relying on marriage licenses for a new
purpose: as a way of distributing resources to dependents. The Social Security
Act provided survivors’ benefits with proof of marriage. Employers used
marital status to determine whether they would provide health insurance or
pension benefits to employees’ dependents. Courts and hospitals required a
marriage license before granting couples the privilege of inheriting from
each other or receiving medical information.
In the 1950s, using the marriage license as a shorthand way
to distribute benefits and legal privileges made some sense because almost
all adults were married. Cohabitation and single parenthood by choice were
very rare. Today, however, possession of a marriage license tells us little
about people’s interpersonal responsibilities. Half of all Americans aged
25 to 29 are unmarried, and many of them already have incurred obligations
as partners, parents or both. Almost 40 percent of America’s children are
born to unmarried parents. Meanwhile, many legally married people are in
remarriages where their obligations are spread among several households.
ACCOUNT 2
Many on the religious right claim that marriage was a
“divine institution” all along and that the state took control of marriage
from the church. This is utterly false. Marriage was neither connected to
the church or to the state for much of human history. A marriage basically
amounted to two individuals announcing their marriage to friends and family
and setting up house. There may have been a “wedding feast” as depicted in the
New Testament but there was no church ceremony. Early Christian churches
had nothing to do with marriage. They did not perform marriages. The first
attempt by the Christian sect to take control of marriage was in 1545 when
the Council of Trent announced that marriages would no longer be recognized
as valid unless a priest performed them with two witnesses present. Prior
to that a marriage was considered valid if two individuals merely pledged
themselves to one another, regardless if anyone else knew about the matter.
Martin Luther went further than Calvin and said marriage was “of the
earthly kingdom” and “subject to the prince, not to the Pope.” It was the
misnamed “Reformations” who brought in state control of marriage.
Protestant leaders invited the state to take control of marriage. John
Calvin’s “Marriage Ordinance of Geneva” required a state permit and church
consecration before a marriage was recognized. This was in 1545 as well.
The state did not take over marriage. First, marriage was entirely private
without interference of either church or state. Catholicism started to
exert control over marriage in 1545 and then the Protestant Reformations
demanded that the state take ultimate control over marriage. Of course,
they assumed the state would be under their control at the time. Certainly
when Calvin pushed his detailed regulations of marriage onto the law books
in Geneva he was, for all intents and purposes, the ruler of that poor
city.
Researched by www.truthgospel.org
|
TTGM
PUBLICATION:
Be no
longer deceived, we invite you to read "It is TRUTH". Be prepared in truth
before it is your turn to go onto the other side.
This book touches
on a number of critical subjects that are taught in Christendom and it shows
how man's deception has twisted the word of God. If you want to worship God
and follow Jesus (Yeshua) in spirit and in TRUTH, this book is for you. In
reading the book I pray you understand God's word as God intended.
This book is also fact-based. Evidence to support what is stated will be
shown both biblically and historically by links and references to
authoritative sources.
Contents include the following:
The commandments and the Torah | Deception in the church
Why would iniquity keep you out of Heaven? | Are you in God’s will?
Do you have the heart of an adulterer? | Are you thinking marriage?
What is true marriage? | Is polygamy sin in the eyes of God?
The right and wrong way to become one flesh and much more.
To get your free copy go to LuLu
To support our Ministry buy
the
Kindle ebook from Amazon ($0.99 USD)
- Paperback is also available. You can also give away this book as a
gift to family and friends.
|
|
|
